why among us is bad

Art Scpae

3 min read

·

27-11-2024

50

0

Share

Among Us: A Critical Look Beyond the Hype

Among Us, the deceptively simple social deduction game, exploded onto the scene in 2020, becoming a global phenomenon. Its charming visuals and deceptively simple gameplay masked a deeper truth: Among Us, while initially captivating, ultimately suffers from significant flaws that prevent it from being a truly great game, despite its enduring popularity. This article delves into those shortcomings, exploring why Among Us, despite its successes, ultimately falls short of its potential.

The Problem of Repetitive Gameplay:

The core gameplay loop of Among Us is undeniably addictive in short bursts. The tension of identifying the imposter(s) amidst a crew of innocent players is palpable. However, this core loop, despite its variations in map design and task variety, quickly becomes repetitive. A single game rarely lasts more than 10-15 minutes, leaving players constantly restarting, seeking that elusive, perfect game. This short playtime, while initially appealing, contributes to a feeling of shallowness, preventing the development of deeper strategic thinking or complex character dynamics. The lack of significant long-term progression further exacerbates this issue; there's little incentive to play beyond the immediate thrill of the hunt.

Limited Strategic Depth:

While deception and social engineering are central to Among Us, the strategic depth is surprisingly limited. Experienced players quickly learn to exploit predictable patterns in player behavior, leading to games dominated by meta-gaming rather than genuine deduction. The simple mechanics leave little room for nuanced strategies; successful play often relies more on luck and quick reflexes than on sophisticated planning or tactical maneuvering. The lack of complex character abilities or diverse roles further restricts strategic options, turning many games into a predictable cycle of accusations and self-preservation.

Toxicity and the Problem of Communication:

The social element, while intended to be a major strength of Among Us, often becomes a significant weakness. The in-game chat, limited to simple text messages, often devolves into toxicity. Accusations are hurled without evidence, leading to arguments and frustration. The anonymity afforded by the game allows players to act with impunity, fostering an environment where insults and disruptive behavior are commonplace. The lack of robust moderation mechanisms within the game itself exacerbates this problem, leaving players feeling vulnerable to harassment and unpleasant interactions. This negativity can quickly overshadow the fun, particularly for less experienced or more sensitive players.

Technical Limitations and Lack of Innovation:

Despite its popularity, Among Us suffers from noticeable technical limitations. The simple graphics, while charming initially, lack the polish and visual appeal of more modern games. The game’s engine is also relatively basic, occasionally leading to lag, glitches, and other technical problems that detract from the overall experience. Furthermore, the lack of significant updates or expansions has left the game feeling stagnant. While new maps and cosmetics have been added, these are largely superficial changes that fail to address the underlying issues with gameplay and mechanics. The lack of innovation in terms of gameplay mechanics or the introduction of new game modes prevents the game from evolving and staying fresh.

The Imposter Role's Limitations:

While the imposter role is inherently fun, it too suffers from limitations. The options available to the imposter are relatively limited, often boiling down to simple acts of sabotage and killing players. There's little room for creativity or nuanced deception beyond these basic actions. Experienced players quickly learn to identify common imposter tactics, making it increasingly difficult for imposters to succeed. This imbalance, where experienced players often can identify imposters relatively quickly, leads to a less engaging experience for both parties.

The Issue of Scalability:

Among Us works best with a smaller number of players. As the player count increases, the game becomes more chaotic and less focused. The increased number of potential imposters and crewmates makes it more difficult to identify the guilty parties, turning the game into a confusing and frustrating experience. The limited communication options further amplify this problem, making it harder to coordinate actions and deduce the truth amidst the noise.

Beyond the Initial Excitement:

The initial charm of Among Us is undeniable. The simplicity and social interaction were highly appealing, particularly during the peak of the pandemic when many sought virtual social connections. However, the lack of depth, the repetitive gameplay, and the prevalence of toxicity ultimately reveal the game's limitations. While it served as a satisfying, albeit temporary, distraction, its shortcomings prevent it from being a truly enduring or ultimately great game. The game's success highlights the power of social media trends and the appeal of simple, easy-to-learn games, but it also underscores the importance of long-term design considerations and the need to avoid repetitive gameplay loops if one wants to create a truly engaging and lasting experience. Its legacy serves as a reminder that initial hype doesn't always translate to lasting quality. The appeal of Among Us was short-lived, and that speaks volumes about its inherent limitations. The game succeeded in capturing a moment in time, but its flaws ultimately prevented it from becoming a timeless classic.